Re: Unstructured headers

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Marc Mutz (mutz@kde.org)
Date: Fri May 03 2002 - 02:33:25 CDT


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 02 May 2002 18:34, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> The syntax used to say, for example,
>
> Summary-content = 1*( [FWS] utext )
>
> (which was wrong BTW, because I promised in 4.2.3 that every content would
> end in optional FWS).

This should probably be "end in optional WS", since allowing FWS here means
allowing lines containing only WS in the header.

Marc

- --
Marc Mutz <mutz@kde.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE80j1G3oWD+L2/6DgRAohbAKCft70r97oM000FuF0YnkCes0Z1SwCg4xr0
Os0aLyzC4L2e61DLjqKa+1A=
=oCDJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.