From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Sat May 04 2002 - 15:37:46 CDT
In <200205030933.27041@sendmail.mutz.com> Marc Mutz <mutz@kde.org> writes:
>On Thursday 02 May 2002 18:34, Charles Lindsey wrote:
>> The syntax used to say, for example,
>>
>> Summary-content = 1*( [FWS] utext )
>>
>> (which was wrong BTW, because I promised in 4.2.3 that every content would
>> end in optional FWS).
>This should probably be "end in optional WS", since allowing FWS here means
>allowing lines containing only WS in the header.
No, there is wording in 4.2.3 to cover that situation. There is similar
wording in RFC 2822.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5