From: Marc Mutz (mutz@kde.org)
Date: Sun May 05 2002 - 09:09:35 CDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 04 May 2002 22:37, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> In <200205030933.27041@sendmail.mutz.com> Marc Mutz <mutz@kde.org> writes:
> >On Thursday 02 May 2002 18:34, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> >> The syntax used to say, for example,
> >>
> >> Summary-content = 1*( [FWS] utext )
> >>
> >> (which was wrong BTW, because I promised in 4.2.3 that every content
> >> would end in optional FWS).
> >
> >This should probably be "end in optional WS", since allowing FWS here
> > means allowing lines containing only WS in the header.
>
> No, there is wording in 4.2.3 to cover that situation. There is similar
> wording in RFC 2822.
I understand so much. I just thought it might me nice to have grammar and
prose agree on it.
Marc
- --
Marc Mutz <mutz@kde.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE81T0f3oWD+L2/6DgRAm8bAKCIJpyJs6wjlHRqxTew7VSoT0KlKgCeLGek
vZg9byQEK3ZAG9XaKwMDTkM=
=IY6o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----