From: Frank Ellermann (nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de)
Date: Mon May 06 2002 - 02:37:39 CDT
Could you please add some more explanations in sections 5.2,
6.1, 6.19, and 7.3 about addresses using TLD .invalid in news
"for whatever reason" ?
- in 6.1 (Reply-To) TLD .invalid should be explicitly mentioned
as abuse. For examples where TLD .invalid is already used in
Reply-To headers, see the recent discussions in the newsgroup
de.admin.net-abuse.mail
- in 5.2 (From) TLD .invalid should be restricted to clients
of systems supporting 6.19 (Injector-Info). If that's not
your intention please add some examples, how 7.3 (Cancel) is
meant to work in conjunction with TLD .invalid (if at all).
- in 6.19 (Injector-Info) please add instructions for the use
of sender=verified in conjunction with TLD .invalid.
The background of these questions is quite simple, some posters
(in TLH de) are planning to use TLD .invalid a.s.a.p. as a kind
of miraculous spam block. So at least all technical drawbacks
SHOULD (or Ought to ;-) be clear.
Bye, Frank