From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Wed May 08 2002 - 23:01:06 CDT
In <Gvsr2o.M34@clw.cs.man.ac.uk>, on 05/08/2002
at 02:32 PM, "Charles Lindsey" <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> said:
>My inclination is to leave most of these unchanged unless I hear
>support from the List.
I'd prefer to leave most of them as is, but I can live with the
following changes:
>Item 5.
Allow some sort of identity token rather than the actual address. But
I'd still want a MUST on the token actually belonging to . . .
>Item 6.
>relaying agents MAY
That's reasonable.
>Item 9.
His objection is reasonable. I'd propose a note that a subsequent RFC
is anticipated that will relax or modify the rules for moderators. Of
course, if someone can work up acceptable language in time to make the
IETF deadline, then we should consider including it now.
>Item 10.
I'm not really happy with the change, but I can live with it.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2
Team OS/2
Team PL/I
-----------------------------------------------------------