Re: lack of implementation (was Re: Internal LAST CALL)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Wed May 08 2002 - 23:51:47 CDT


Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> writes:

> Note that the entry point of the standards track, Proposed Standard,
> explicitly does not require implementation experience (although it is
> considered desirable... but note that *most* of our draft does have such
> experience behind it). The question of whether some detail has actually
> been implemented enough to be worth bothering about is properly
> revisited at Draft Standard stage.

Fair enough.

I think I'll probably still present my objections, but if the draft
proceeds anyway, I'll do what I can to see it succeed, since a working
Usenet standard *would* be a good thing. Maybe we can clean up some stuff
that I don't like at the Draft Standard stage.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.