Re: MUST/SHOULD/Ought

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Andrew Gierth (andrew@erlenstar.demon.co.uk)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 13:26:34 CDT


>>>>> "Henry" == Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> writes:

 Henry> Mind you, there's a potential problem with that: if a reader
 Henry> agent *is* checking, it won't believe Xref headers with a
 Henry> different name, no matter how much care has been taken to
 Henry> ensure that they are valid. I have no data on how widespread
 Henry> such checking is.

I don't believe there is significant use of non-matching Xref headers
(at least, I don't recall ever seeing any system set up that way).
What _does_ happen is sites putting a dummy path entry in, so that
the headers look like

Path: 0!news.example.com!...
Xref: 0 example.group:1234

which would look right to a client that checks, but which introduces
a potentially non-unique path entry.

In this instance, though, the non-uniqueness of the path entry causes
no harm that I know of (since it's in addition to the site's real entry).
There are variations on this; e.g. "sn-us" as the path entry (short but
probably still unique).

-- 
Andrew.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.