From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk)
Date: Fri May 10 2002 - 08:00:29 CDT
In <20020509094609.13500.qmail@wilhelmina.algonet.se> sommar@algonet.se (Erland Sommarskog) writes:
>> You want SHOULD here? Or even weaker? I could be persuaded if others agree,
>> though I don't entirely buy the size argument.
>Maybe there is some good argument for having the same name in Path and
>in Xref, but it is not obvious to me what it would be. In such case,
>Andrew has a point, and the requirement should be removed completely.
I think I am persuaded on this one. But I shall make it clear that the
server-name must uniquely identify the server in some manner so that user
agents will not be misled (so as to cover Henry's point).
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5