From: Henry Spencer (email@example.com)
Date: Wed May 29 2002 - 15:09:49 CDT
(Sorry for slow response, I was away for several days and am still
clearing the backlog.)
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> What I actually propose to write is
> "It is anticipated that [Son-of-1036] will be republished as an
> Historic RFC, in a suitably-relabelled form, following the
> publication of this standard."
That sounds fine.
> OK, I have
> That document formed the original basis for this standard and its
> author has endorsed this standard as its successor. Much is taken
> directly ...
Sounds good, except that I would either put a comma after "standard", or
replace the "and" with a semicolon, to make it clear that there are two
separate clauses in that sentence.