Re: Extended newsgroup tags; another approach

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Clive D.W. Feather (clive@demon.net)
Date: Tue Oct 01 2002 - 02:16:02 CDT


Bruce Lilly said:
>> Bruce> * when a newsgroup is created, in addition to the usual
>> Bruce> information (description, moderated status, etc.) there
>> Bruce> is a new field (tentatively called rich-name).
>> proposed years ago and rejected - the extent of server changes
>> required is much more substantial than any of the other approaches (it
>> affects not only the server implementation but also the NNTP
>> protocol).

In addition, you will end up with user confusion as some people quote the
Newsgroups header and others quote the rich-name.

> It's possible to implement w/o protocol changes; there's no reason
> why the rich-name couldn't be returned as the last item in the
> reply to a GROUP command.

Wrong wrong wrong. That's a protocol change to NNTP. An incompatible one,
at that.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive@demon.net>   | Tel:  +44 20 8371 1138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive@davros.org>  | Fax:  +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc            |                            | NOTE: fax number change


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.