From: Claus Färber (list-ietf-wg-apps-usefor@faerber.muc.de)
Date: Sun Oct 06 2002 - 09:42:00 CDT
Erland Sommarskog <sommar-usefor@algonet.se> schrieb/wrote:
> What we all were very much in agreement on was that RFC2047 is a hassle
> in general, and for Newsgroups completely impossible. Then over the
> years, there has been the occassional guest who have opposed raw UTF-8
> and suggested various other schemes. (And =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus_F=E4rber?=
> did every once in a while suggest some alternative encoding.)
Please quote me correctly. I did never suggest an alternative to RFC
2047.
Further, you are again implying that newsgroups names and human-readable
text need to share the same encoding. This is plain wrong.
Futher, reiterating one's position all the time until those who don't
agree get tired of also doing so does not make an 'agreement'.
Claus
-- ------------------------ http://www.faerber.muc.de/ ------------------------ OpenPGP: DSS 1024/639680F0 E7A8 AADB 6C8A 2450 67EA AF68 48A5 0E63 6396 80F0