From: Forrest J. Cavalier III (mibsoft@epix.net)
Date: Mon Oct 07 2002 - 09:06:29 CDT
sommar-usefor@algonet.se (Erland Sommarskog) wrote, in part:
> True, when we discuss a the new group in the se.* hierarchy (not that we
> do this anymore), we would have to determine both a regular name and a
> "prettyname". But the regular name would be at least as important as
> the prettyname, and all the concerns we have today how a name which
> includes sS~ will be interpreted when replaced with aao would still
> remain, and we would in some cases still have to bend over backwards
> to find a name which does not have any such problem.
>
Your message did not specify a character set in headers. (What was
it?)
Does your MUA allow you to send the message properly, or did you
choose not to? (That is not a troll, just an honest question.)
This error may not change what you were trying to say,
but the fact that it occurred is probably relevant to the
discussion.