From: Claus Färber (list-ietf-wg-apps-usefor@faerber.muc.de)
Date: Sat Oct 19 2002 - 06:51:00 CDT
Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> schrieb/wrote:
> Which would be hard if the canonical form were to be some encoded form.
Why? We'd just have a canonical "user-friendly" (consisting of human-
readable characters) and a canonical "machine-friendly" (consisting of
octets) form. The mapping between them is just not ASCII but, for
example, Punycode.
Claus
-- ------------------------ http://www.faerber.muc.de/ ------------------------ OpenPGP: DSS 1024/639680F0 E7A8 AADB 6C8A 2450 67EA AF68 48A5 0E63 6396 80F0