From: Ralph Babel (rbabel@babylon.pfm-mainz.de)
Date: Thu Sep 12 2002 - 13:44:50 CDT
Bruce Lilly wrote:
> [once again, the issue isn't quite as clear-cut
> as the canned selections indicate...]
Of course not; that's what #5 is for, and the longer
responses generally do provide valuable input.
> The exception to the canned statement is that (w.r.t.
> user I/O) the newsgroup names are not MIME encoded -- but
> that's because MIME encoding isn't readily applicable.
That's basically #2.
> (is there an encoding issue for Message-ID?).
No, but a syntax issue.
> Of course the IETF will be grateful for having the
> opportunity to fix the Usefor WG's problems and will
> no doubt profusely thank the WG for having worked
> so diligently over the course of so long a time
> to generate that opportunity.
Yup, certainly.