From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Dec 19 2003 - 09:19:36 CST
In <3FE2205D.2090809@durham.ac.uk> Nick Boalch <n.g.boalch@durham.ac.uk> writes:
>In the majority of cases I would support the inclusion of most of the GNKSA
>items you flag at some point in USEAGE -- mostly in our putative section 3.5.
>Below I refer to some items that I feel particularly strongly about, for
>whatever reeason!
>(Incidentally, I note some of the minor changes you've reported making to the
>draft over the last couple of weeks impact on some of the sections flagged as
>differing from GNKSA. If we're going to ge the GNKSA guy involved, it might be
>helpful to have a completely up-to-date draft online?)
I don't think I have changed enough yet to warrant a fresh draft, though
it might be worthwhile after I have done the first batch of changes
(SHOULDs into MUSTs). And the GNKSA guy has not responded yet, so we are
on our own there.
Another problem is that I still cannot publish this draft on the IETF
site, because out chair has not yet permitted it (neither has he refused
it). Looks like I am going to have to contact the AD next.
The rest of your points look like they will be in the second batch. I note
that you seem to be in favour of the section 3.5 on interface issues. Is
that the general opinion here?
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5