Re: Language Tagging within Unicode

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 12:47:12 CST


In <3E3EC4E0.7080801@Sonietta.blilly.com>, on 02/03/2003
   at 02:37 PM, Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com> said:

>Unicode 3.1/3.2 are not universally deployed. No header fields may
>yet contain unencoded non-ascii octets, either in the message header
>or in MIME-part headers.

The horse is already out of the barn, and nothing we write will put
him back. The best that we can achieve is to convince people to use a
common interpretation for non-ASCII octets in the header.
 

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2
     Team OS/2
     Team PL/I
-----------------------------------------------------------


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.