From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 09 2003 - 11:58:56 CST
Charles Lindsey <chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> writes:
> Now it is inevitable that strings that were encoded in RFC 2047 will
> have been decoded into the local charset, for how else can the user edit
> them when composing his followup? And they may get re-encoded in RFC
> 2047 when they are sent out again.
It's really not particularly hard to keep track of what strings were
originally encoded and to see if they were actually changed by the user
before re-encoding them instead of just using the original strings.
-- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>