From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Fri Jan 17 2003 - 09:09:33 CST
In <3E25CCE7.5000501@Sonietta.blilly.com>, on 01/15/2003
at 04:04 PM, Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com> said:
>That's the same charter which says
My reading of the charter is that we we to produce multiple
documents, some of which could have been experimental in nature.
Perhaps we need a base document that says must accept, should not
generate until a supporting STD is passed and an experimental RFC that
specifies raw UTF-8 plus gatewaying requirements. If we go that
route, is there any reason that the experimental RFC could not be
submitted first?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2
Team OS/2
Team PL/I
-----------------------------------------------------------