Signed message and public open injectors [was a completely indequate title]

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Jean-Marc Desperrier (jean-marc.desperrier@certplus.com)
Date: Tue Jan 21 2003 - 14:37:47 CST


Brad Templeton a écrit:
> digital signature allows you to completely rethink that, to split
> the authentication and tracing problem away from the transport system.
[...]
> So I challenge you -- why, with a signed article, do we need
> what is traditionally thought of as an injector at all?

Brad, a certificate _enables_ you do get that, but it does not _provide_
you that.

It would not be the transport system system that does authentification
and tracing, because that would be done by the CA that emitted the
certificate.
But a CA that can do that for anybody, securely and for free, does, and
can not exist, so what you describe is a dream.
It could exist if every ISP would deliver free anonymous (but linked to
an internal ID) certificates to it's clients, and the injector could
access a public, trusted list of the CA of reputables ISP before
accepting the message. We're very, very far from that.

It would be possible to have an extra-header that lists the headers that
are signed. Or encapsulation. But encapsulation is not always mail-safe.

PS :
Am I the only one who changes the titles on this list ?
I set the original title of this thread, but it had nothing more to see
with it in the last message.


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29.