From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2003 - 10:05:55 CDT
In <HHAI4G.1wI@clerew.man.ac.uk>, on 06/30/2003
at 10:21 AM, "Charles Lindsey" <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk> said:
>What I therefore now suggest is that it be reoganized with sections
>directed towards the proper behaviours expected of implementors,
>hierarchy administrators, server/relayer administrators, moderators,
>users, etc. The implementors section might well be split into
>injecting, relaying, serving and user agents, plus gateways. The
>existing paragraphs would be moved to their proper places, and
>rewritten to provide a coherent picture in their new environments.
>Does that sound like a reasonable overall strategy?
Yes.
>2. Do we want to include all/most of the material in the existing
>GNKSA?
Yes, along with a link to GNKSA.
>3. Do we want to include an updated version of RFC 1855 (Netiquette
>Guidelines)?
That sounds like one to discuss when the time comes; IMHO an
up-or-down decision would be premature at this time.
>If we do think it appropriate to include the GNKSA and Netiquette
>material, then we ought first to contact the authors of those
>existing documents and invite them to participate,
Excellent idea even if we don't use their material.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2
Team OS/2
Team PL/I
-----------------------------------------------------------