From: Boris 'pi' Piwinger (3.14@piology.org)
Date: Wed Jun 11 2003 - 01:46:53 CDT
John Stanley <stanley@peak.org> wrote:
>I know you will continue to refuse to answer the question, but FOR WHAT
>PURPOSE that is NOT better served by the mandatory References header?
I did answer it, you keep ignoring it while not answering
why we should change what everybody does now.
But as long as you play silly games with the subject I don't
expect to hear any reasonable argument anyhow.
I don't think we should change the standard for these games.
Better stay with the real world.
pi