Re: In tha matter of: Subject-header and "Re: "

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Jun 12 2003 - 11:39:10 CDT


In <Pine.BSI.3.91.1030611143310.23614F-100000@spsystems.net> Henry Spencer
<henry@spsystems.net> writes:

>> I am now in listening mode...

>The question is, what are you listening for? (Other than repetitions of
>already-stated positions.)

Ultimately for our chair(s) I suppose. My rough count indicated 9 or maybe
10 people asking for clear (even normative) wording in USEFOR, and 3
people asking for the opposite. But I may have slightly misunderstood
some positions.

I have said my piece. I have given up arguing with John, since he
consistently fails to acknowledge the difference between 'Re' and
'References', which has been explained several times.

So it is up to the group now to decide.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.