Re: document names (was Re: USEAGE)

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Date: Fri May 02 2003 - 11:04:26 CDT


In <Pine.BSI.3.91.1030501173804.18645K-100000@spsystems.net> Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> writes:

>Assuming we go with the chairs' scheme for the four-way split -- which, as
>noted before, I think is advisable -- a thought on possible names:

> #1 USEFOR format
> #2 USEPRO protocols
> #3 USEAGE "Good Netkeeping"
> #4 USEINT internationalization

>(Yes, #3's name is not spelled the same way as the English word "usage".
>So what? None of these names are English words.)

Yes, that is why I spelt it the "funny way" (also because, it turns out,
"USAGE" breaks my cross-referencing system).

Note that, for the moment, USEFOR means the combined #1+#2 document, as in
the current draft.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.