Re: document names (was Re: USEAGE)

From: Claus Färber (list-ietf-wg-apps-usefor@faerber.muc.de)
Date: Sun May 04 2003 - 05:20:00 CDT


Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> schrieb/wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Charles Lindsey wrote:
>> We have agreed that the document should be split into (at least) two, a
>> standards track document (USEFOR) and an Informational document covering
>> "Good Netkeeping" issues (which I have called USEAGE for the time
>> being).

> Assuming we go with the chairs' scheme for the four-way split -- which, as
> noted before, I think is advisable -- a thought on possible names:

> #1 USEFOR format

I think the control messages (for administration, i.e. newsgroup
creation and deletion) should have a seperate specification:

#1a USECTRL USEnet ConTRoL messages.

> #2 USEPRO protocols

Which protocols?

NNTP is defined by a differnet working group.

> #3 USEAGE "Good Netkeeping"
> #4 USEINT internationalization

> (Yes, #3's name is not spelled the same way as the English word "usage".
> So what? None of these names are English words.)

Claus

-- 
http://www.faerber.muc.de/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.