From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Sep 03 2003 - 08:11:03 CDT
In <87fzjf12m5.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
>Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk> writes:
>> So I would ask those in favour of the #1/#2 split to look carefully
>> through the latest draft (-11) and tell me what else, if anything, they
>> believe should be moved to #2
>Not without some word from the chair about the long-term direction of the
>group. Until we have more information and guidance, a charter, and a
>clearer understanding of the mission, I don't believe it's worthwhile to
>continue this editing exercise.
I don't think there is any intention that the editing exercise should not
continue. The only issue is exactly how, which is why I am concentrating
my efforts at the moment on those parts (e.g. #3) which appear not to be
controversial.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5