Re: New followup text

From: Eivind Tagseth (eivindt@multinet.no)
Date: Thu Apr 01 2004 - 04:55:04 CST


* Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk> [2004-03-29 14:51:00 +0000]:

> In <200403272350.i2RNoVl07151@panix5.panix.com> Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> writes:
> >I didn't, and I don't like the idea: too many (broken but existing)
> >user agents truncate long Subject headers.

> I have seen threads entirely fragmented as a consequence of that.

Why would the threads fragment? I can see how this may cause your
news agent to indicate a change of subject, but there should be no
fragmentation if the references header was used.

Are you using an agent that ignores the references header, or are the
threads you read made up of posts by broken news agents that doesn't
add a references header?

Eivind




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.