From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Apr 02 2004 - 12:36:28 CST
In <406CD07A.4050702@erols.com> Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com> writes:
>This draft, as a product of this WG, has no jurisdiction over the
>definition of fields defined in RFCs 822 and/or 2822.
We have already determined that is not so, and that subject is closed
until such time as the members of this WG ask me to reopen it. I hear no
such requests. There were syntactic differences for some headers in RFC
1036, and there are syntactic differences in our draft. And some of those
same syntactic differences are also present in the new NNTP draft which is
currently the subject of IETF Last Call.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5