Re: Document definitions

From: Bruce Lilly (blilly@erols.com)
Date: Sun Aug 01 2004 - 14:13:41 CDT


Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:

> It was considered; that's why the draft does not introduce MIME
> parameters for existing header fields.

Why do you keep repeating that lie? Path is an existing field.
Newsgroups is an existing field. Lines is not only an existing
field, it's deprecated and likely to be dropped -- now explain
exactly why it has to have *new* syntax introduced at this time.




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.