Re: Document definitions

From: Bruce Lilly (blilly@erols.com)
Date: Sun Aug 01 2004 - 14:32:47 CDT


Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
> In <20040730042304.GB16893@dora.tertius.net.au>, on 07/30/2004
> at 02:23 PM, Thorfinn <thorfinn@tertius.net.au> said:
>
>
>>What testable constraints? "Accept" is a fairly meaningless word.
>>It just means "read the header and don't blow up". Just about
>>*anything* "accepts" MIME parameters.
>
>
> In which case it is not a burdensome requirement.

Nor does it do anything to pave the way for interpretation of
such parameters -- the *only* excuse given to date for introducing
such syntax at this time. The only thing that would do that would
be full parsing.




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.