From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Sun Aug 01 2004 - 12:44:12 CDT
In <Pine.LNX.4.53.0407301149460.12024@a.shell.peak.org>, on 07/30/2004
at 11:54 AM, John Stanley <stanley@peak.org> said:
>That's a fascinating statement. Are you really saying that a FAQ
>which is short enough to fit in one part will never be posted,
>because "part 1" would not be posted were it not for the existance
>of a part 2?
No, John, as usual you are doing what you accuse others of, and
attempting to put words in my mouth. Had I meant that then I would
have written it. What I am REALLY saying is that when someone splits a
long FAQ into multiple parts, none of the parts has a preferred
status. What prompts each part is the entire FAQ.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)