Re: Document definitions

From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Sun Aug 01 2004 - 15:16:15 CDT


In <410D455F.6060905@erols.com>, on 08/01/2004
   at 03:32 PM, Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com> said:

>Nor does it do anything to pave the way for interpretation of such
>parameters -- the *only* excuse given to date for introducing such
>syntax at this time. The only thing that would do that would be full
>parsing.

Full parsing is not necessary in order to introduce MIME parameters.
It would only be necessary if a new RFC said MUST act on the new
parameter.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2        <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.