Re: References definitions and capabilities

From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Tue Aug 03 2004 - 20:09:52 CDT


In <ceo7ij$mbp$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com>, on 08/03/2004
   at 10:39 AM, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> said:

>A followup is an article with a References header citing another
>article. The References header MUST be provided to indicate that an
>article is a continuation of the discussion on the same topic as a
>previous article, and SHOULD be provided to indicate a logical or
>chronological dependence on another article.

That works for me.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2        <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.