From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Aug 10 2004 - 06:54:50 CDT
In <Pine.LNX.4.53.0408090928150.13125@a.shell.peak.org> John Stanley <stanley@peak.org> writes:
>Then we need not tell the followup agent that is it supposed to add this
>header to the article. Yet, we do.
But followup agents (at least the ones whose duties are set out in our
present draft, and will continue to be set out in USEPRO) are not involved
in the generation of multipart FAQs and the like (that would lead to some
ridiculous outcomes, as I pointed out a couple of days ago).
Which, to me, is a good argument for not regarding later parts of a FAQ as
"followups", although I agree it _could_ be worded that way, and I have
suggested a wording.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5