From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Sun Aug 15 2004 - 09:14:28 CDT
In <411D0F54.2050409@epix.net>, on 08/13/2004
at 02:58 PM, "Forrest J. Cavalier III" <mibsoft@epix.net> said:
>Any objections to this....?
> A "followup" is a message which is related, supplementary, or
> posted to respond to another message. A message includes a
> References header if and only
> if it is a followup.
The problem with that is that part 1 of a FAQ is related to part 2,
but we don't want part 1 to have a References header line with
the id of part 2.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)