Re: References definitions and capabilities

From: Henry Spencer (henry@spsystems.net)
Date: Mon Aug 16 2004 - 12:00:45 CDT


On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Forrest J. Cavalier III wrote:
> [References] ...Certainly USEFOR must specify
> that the content is a list of one or more message IDs only. But for
> everything else about what it is supposed to point to, is it not
> proper to defer to other documents?

Why would it be improper for this document to fully define References?
The *meaning* of the message IDs -- what they should and shouldn't point
to -- is part of the definition of the header.

There is no existing other document to defer to -- news usage differs
sharply from mail usage here, so RFC 2822 is not satisfactory -- and no
reason to separate part of our definition into a different document.

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@spsystems.net




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.