Re: References definitions and capabilities

From: Bruce Lilly (blilly@erols.com)
Date: Thu Aug 26 2004 - 08:08:37 CDT


Charles Lindsey wrote:

> Yes, but the References-header in RFC 2822 changed quite a lot since those
> earlier RFCs.

Nonsense, there have been only minor syntax changes -- and we're not discussing
syntax at the moment.

> Indeed, it has more of less caught up with what had become
> standard practice in Netnews

What on Earth are you blathering about, and what relevance does it have
to the present discussion?




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.