From: Bruce Lilly (blilly@erols.com)
Date: Sun Feb 01 2004 - 06:14:14 CST
Charles Lindsey wrote:
> In <Pine.LNX.4.53.0401201824350.5315@a.shell.peak.org> John Stanley <stanley@peak.org> writes:
>>Also, the "see below" in option 1 should be changed to a footnote, as "see
>>below" could refer to a very large amount of text.
>
>
> It's only 8 lines further on, and not that far to the end of the
> section, which places an upper limit on that "large amount". And the term
> "mailable" as defined here is used elsewhere in the document, so it needs
> to be in the body of the text.
If changing "below" to "later in this section" is less ambiguous and resolves
the issue that John has pointed out, let's change it. Really, it's not
worth quibbling about what the upper limit on "below" is or isn't.