From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 02 2004 - 21:04:30 CST
J B Moreno <planb@newsreaders.com> writes:
> Your message
> ==
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> ==
> His message
> ==
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
> ==
> and then further down
> ==
> Content-Disposition: inline;
> filename*=ISO-8859-1'en-us'Re%3A%208.6
> ==
> Looks like an included file to me.
Yes, it had an included file.
> He forwarded a message as an attachment -- and an attachment is an
> attachment, whether it's a rfc 822 message with a copy of the Lord of
> the Rings body, or an MPG of the Lord of the Rings, it's still an
> attachment.
Yes, it's an attachment. So what? Do you think there's something wrong
with attachments?
You said it was a binary. It wasn't a binary.
-- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>