From: Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 04 2004 - 00:52:32 CST
J B Moreno <planb@newsreaders.com> writes:
> What the hell is wrong with saying that the structure of the Subject is:
> subject-content = [ back-reference ] pure-subject CRLF
> pure-subject = unstructured
> back-reference = %x52.65.3A.20 ; which is a case-sensitive
> "Re: "
It conflicts with mail, which is why this subject came up again this time
around. It's going to keep coming up as long as we keep introducing these
gratuitous incompatibilities with the mail ABNF.
-- Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>