Re: 8.2.2

From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 09 2004 - 08:06:23 CST


In <402441CC.8090401@erols.com> Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com> writes:

>Usenet News Support wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>
>> Why rename it?

>Believe it or not, NNTP isn't the sole mechanism for transport and injection.
>If the field's purpose is to record an injection timestamp, it should be
>named accordingly. We're not writing an NNTP specification in Usefor, we're
>writing a more generic protocol document.

Well, it's nice to be able to agree 100% with Bruce for a change!

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.