From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Feb 16 2004 - 09:17:37 CST
In <87znbmn9xf.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
>Charles Lindsey <chl@clerew.man.ac.uk> writes:
>> 1. I initially proposed that the Injection-Date should normally be
>> rewritten by the injector if there was one already present on arrival.
>> 2. I was roundly told by yourself and John Moreno that this was wrong,
>> would lead to loops, and it was essential to keep the old Injection-Date
>> in all circumstances.
>In all circumstances where the article is accepted. The best thing to do
>when a posting agent includes an Injection-Date header is to simply reject
>the message.
OK, I have got confused by the failure of one of my earlier messages to
get posted. Please see the new thread "Injection-Date", and let us
continue this discussion there.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5