Re: [SPAM:#] Re: compatibility

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

From: John Stanley (stanley@peak.org)
Date: Fri Jul 09 2004 - 21:11:09 CDT

Next message: John Stanley: "Proposed milestones (second attempt)"
Previous message: John Stanley: "Re: RE: and back-reference variants"
Maybe in reply to: Russ Allbery: "Re: [SPAM:#] Re: compatibility"
Next in thread: Seth Breidbart: "Re: [SPAM:#] Re: compatibility"

Seth Breidbart (sethb@panix.com):

>So you want to claim that robomoderated newsgroups are "wrong"?

Since I've claimed no such thing, I'll not bother defending that claim.

Next message: John Stanley: "Proposed milestones (second attempt)"
Previous message: John Stanley: "Re: RE: and back-reference variants"
Maybe in reply to: Russ Allbery: "Re: [SPAM:#] Re: compatibility"
Next in thread: Seth Breidbart: "Re: [SPAM:#] Re: compatibility"

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.