Re: [SPAM:#] Re: compatibility

From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Sun Jul 11 2004 - 00:17:25 CDT


In <200407100226.i6A2QVD03687@panix5.panix.com>, on 07/09/2004
   at 10:26 PM, Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> said:

>Both of those are example of Usenet software parsing

No, they are examples of software running on top of Usenet. Such
software is out of scope and is free to add whatever semantics the
authors wish to whatever header fileds the uthors wish, as long as it
does not attempt to inject noncomplaint articles.

-- 
     Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
     Atid/2        <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.