From: Bruce Lilly (blilly@erols.com)
Date: Mon Jul 19 2004 - 22:17:58 CDT
John Stanley wrote:
> According to our draft, at least, 13.01, it MUST NOT do this, since that
> would be construing "Subject: cmsg" as a request to perform that action.
> I notice that this does not appear to have made it into the latest (00)
> draft. It appears that consensus has been tossed on this.
Chill out, John. The usefor-00 draft is a syntax & semantics document, not
a protocol document. What it says it that the Subject field is exactly as
specified in RFC 2822 (viz. unstructured syntax and having semantics of
only human-readable text indicating the topic of the message).