Re: cmsg

Next message: Charles Lindsey: "Re: Document definitions"
Previous message: John Stanley: "Re: cmsg"
In reply to: John Stanley: "Re: cmsg"
Next in thread: Charles Lindsey: "Re: cmsg"

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

From: Sebastian Brocks (mail@sebastian-brocks.de)
Date: Mon Jul 26 2004 - 16:17:22 CDT

John Stanley wrote:

> No abuse of the unstructured headers. Just reading the RFC and
figuring out what headers
> were required.

How is doing what RFC 1036 explicitly allows a abuse of unstructured
headers?

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.