Re: documents etc. (was Re: Back-references and USEAGE)

From: Alexey Melnikov (alexey.melnikov-usefor@isode.com)
Date: Wed Jun 02 2004 - 05:06:10 CDT


Henry Spencer wrote:

>On Thu, 27 May 2004, John Stanley wrote:
>
>
>>If he just puts them on the website as the current discussion version,
>>there would be no problem.
>>
>>
>
>How about if he just puts them on the IETF draft web/FTP site as the
>current discussion version?
>
>
> ...
>
>>It's not rocket science, Henry. It's just common sense.
>>
>>
>
>No, it's nonsense. Why have two levels of draft process when one suffices?
>There's no need to have "tentative" drafts and "real" ones -- a draft is
>tentative by definition.
>
I agree with Henry. New drafts should be published whenever the WG feels
that there are substantial changes to the document. Feel free to bug me
about publication of new revisions.

I also agree that 6 month cycle is a bit long.

Alexey




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.