From: Bruce Lilly (blilly@erols.com)
Date: Thu Jun 24 2004 - 20:32:21 CDT
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Good point. (And amusingly, I think that's one that our current draft
> isn't addressing at all at the moment, although I'm not sure whether it
> really should.)
I believe it's addressed partially by discussion of MIME message/partial,
which is the preferred method for handling such things. It's also in
accordance with the directive to base our documents on RFC 2822 plus
MIME. However, there are parts of the draft which conflict with that.