Re: multiple part postings

From: Seth Breidbart (sethb@panix.com)
Date: Thu Jun 24 2004 - 23:31:13 CDT


Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com> wrote:

> About all we can constructively accomplish is to point out the
> existing standard mechanism for partitioning a large message into
> pieces and hope that the transport folks will take care of relevant
> matters in their areas.

But for some reason we can't point out the "existing standard
mechanism" for indicating followups to the reader?

Seth




This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7.