From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (Shmuel+gen@patriot.net)
Date: Fri Mar 12 2004 - 18:06:13 CST
In <200403120547.i2C5l8d11426@panix5.panix.com>, on 03/12/2004
at 12:47 AM, Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> said:
>I would prefer (if the wording were fixed)
> SHOULD by default take the Subject from the precursor with "Re: "
> prepended if none present, but MAY refrain from prepending it.
And I would prefer
SHOULD by default take the Subject from the precursor, but MAY
prepend
a single "Re:" is none present. However, that prepending is
deprecated
and may be prohibited in a future RFC.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)