From: Charles Lindsey (chl@clerew.man.ac.uk)
Date: Sat Mar 13 2004 - 09:11:29 CST
In <200403120547.i2C5l8d11426@panix5.panix.com> Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> writes:
>> SHOULD by default take the Subject from the precursor, but MAY prepend
>> a single "Re:" is none present.
>I would prefer (if the wording were fixed)
> SHOULD by default take the Subject from the precursor with "Re: "
> prepended if none present, but MAY refrain from prepending it.
>The meaning is the same, but the emphasis is different. Putting it
>that way is strong enough for me.
No, the meaning is actually a little different (and stronger). I urge to
to take a look at my suggested new wording elsewhere in this thread.
-- Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------ Tel: +44 161 436 6131 Fax: +44 161 436 6133 Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl Email: chl@clerew.man.ac.uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5